<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Movie Banter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com</link>
	<description>Uncut &#38; Raw : Talk about the ins, outs and stories of anything movie related</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Snap Review of She&#8217;s Out of My League</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-shes-out-of-my-league/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-shes-out-of-my-league/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ondras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Baruchel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[She's Out of My League]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My review of Jim Field Smith's comedy "She's Out of My League".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2010_shes_out_of_my_league_004.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-12838" title="SHE'S OUT OF MY LEAGUE" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2010_shes_out_of_my_league_004-1024x680.jpg" alt="" width="530" height="351" /></a>A date movie? That&#8217;s also *gasp*&#8230;funny?!? <em>She&#8217;s Out of My League</em> may not fit perfectly into this classification, but it sure is a hell of a lot of fun to watch this wonderful little comedy try.<br />
Kirk is a loser, no matter which way you look at him. He&#8217;s a deadpan terminal security guard, his manipulative ex-girlfriend still lives with he and his parents, and his friends are less than supportive of anything he decides to take a crack at. But that all changes when he meets Molly, a girl so mind-blowing his friends deem her a &#8220;10&#8243; on a hotness scale, and Kirk a 5. Once the kid finds out Molly has feelings for him other than pity, Kirk spends the rest of the movie trying to step up to the ghost standard he assumes she&#8217;s set for him. The most original plot? No way. Though <em>She&#8217;s Out of My League </em>comes in an arms-open time at the movies where your only hope for laughs is at <em>Shutter Island&#8217;s</em> mediocrity. (Yes, I&#8217;m still hung up on that.)<br />
Jay Baruchel is on his way to becoming a true blue Hollywood actor. Having only played minor roles in comedies much bigger than he, <em>Tropic Thunder</em> and <em>Knocked Up</em>, Baruchel is finally coming into his own. He brings his Canadian-bred voice to DreamWorks <em>How To Train Your Dragon</em>, as well as having written a few scripts that are finally likely to be put onto the screen.<em> She&#8217;s Out of My League </em>is your first real chance to see him in action.<br />
As a leading man Baruchel almost makes it. Kirk&#8217;s hero is called to be disguised as a meek dude looking to score with anyone willing to coincide, however at times he seems uncomfortable having to front-run the entire film. English newcomer Alice Eve helps him alongside his trip, marvelous at making Kirk&#8217;s daily life pale in comparison to her extravagant one. Debra Jo Rupp, Kyle Bornheimer, and Andrew Daly are welcome cameos in this carefree surprise.<br />
<em>She&#8217;s Out of My League</em> falls into hopelessly tired cliches typical rom-coms generally do. But it has a lovable destination in mind that it actually does reach, mechanical as it may be at doing this, but come on! There&#8217;s so much to genuinely like here. Director Jim Field Smith&#8217;s prodigy isn&#8217;t anything as hilarious as something per<em> The Hangover</em>, and it doesn&#8217;t have the brains <em>Knocked Up</em> has, however <em>She&#8217;s Out of My League</em> is a breezy, feelgood everyman comedy in the likes of <em>I Love You, Man</em>.</p>
<p><strong>3.5/5 stars.</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #008000;">Watch my full review of <em>She&#8217;s Out of My League</em></span> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtgqOTexg0c">here</a>!<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-shes-out-of-my-league/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Harold and Kumar’ Christmas Movie Happening, According to John Cho</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/%e2%80%98harold-and-kumar%e2%80%99-christmas-movie-happening-according-to-john-cho/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/%e2%80%98harold-and-kumar%e2%80%99-christmas-movie-happening-according-to-john-cho/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ondras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold and Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kal Penn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next 'Harold and Kumar' movie makes a threequel, according to co-star John Cho.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/harold_and_kumar_escape_from_guantanamo_bay_ver2_xlg.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12830" title="harold_and_kumar_escape_from_guantanamo_bay_ver2_xlg" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/harold_and_kumar_escape_from_guantanamo_bay_ver2_xlg.jpg" alt="" width="544" height="442" /></a>If I had a nickel for every time I’ve come across the first and funniest <em>Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle</em> on Comedy Central during off weekends, I’d be a very rich man. This unlikely hit spawned only $18.3 million here in the U.S., however increased DVD sales of the stoner comedy starring John Cho and Kal Penn caused Fox to hire writer-directors Hayden Schlossberg and Jon Hurwitz (dropping Danny Leiner, <em>White Castle’s</em> director) again to make <em>Harold and Kumar: Escape from Guantanamo Bay</em>. The aftermath lacked some of the inane wit its forerunner boasted, but I’m willing to give the fast food-dwellers another shot. And it looks like they’ll be getting one rather soon.</p>
<p>We all remember when Kal Penn came out of nowhere when he declared he would be temporarily secluding himself from drama <em>House</em> to work under Obama as an associate director of the White House Office of Public Liaison last spring. That was when the rumor of a <em>Harold and Kumar</em> Christmas threequel could be happening as quickly as his term ended. Apparently when you’re high you can’t lie, since co-header John Cho is telling Collider.com that <em>A Very Harold and Kumar Christmas</em> (really, that title?) is an extremely realistic idea right now. The movie would take place a few years after the last one ended (obviously) and have something to do with the birth of Christ.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t say I’m a diehard for <em>Harold and Kumar</em> more than just I am just another fan. The original was fun, yes; but forgive me for presuming it lacked the balls of a franchise. <em>Guantanamo Bay</em> did some pretty hilarious things with its surroundings, and <em>White Castle</em> worked despite its typecast characters. Maybe <em>A Very Harold and Kumar Christmas</em> will do the same using a holiday circuit and not just cheap shot-jokes of bongs as tree ornaments or doing nasty things with Santa’s cookies. Periodic festivity-meets-rambunctious troublemakers hasn’t worked so well in the past, i.e. <em>Christmas Vacation</em> (sorry, Craig). Maybe this will play out better with an R-rating. Here’s hoping so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/%e2%80%98harold-and-kumar%e2%80%99-christmas-movie-happening-according-to-john-cho/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blockbuster is Pissing Off Customers With Bringing Back Late Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/blockbuster-is-pissing-off-customers-with-bringing-back-late-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/blockbuster-is-pissing-off-customers-with-bringing-back-late-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kessler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Source: Flickr
I lived at home for a year after graduating college and commuted to the city everyday by train.  I enjoyed growing up and had such a great college experience, culminating it to backpacking the middle east for almost a month right after.  Then I entered the working world, began living in the same baby [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blockbuster.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12825" title="blockbuster" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blockbuster-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Source: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/imjosh/476232597/">Flickr</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I lived at home for a year after graduating college and commuted to the city everyday by train.  I enjoyed growing up and had such a great college experience, culminating it to backpacking the middle east for almost a month right after.  Then I entered the working world, began living in the same baby room I did when I was 15, did the daily grind with the rest of the zombies, and had no life.  Due to the fact that I lived at home, didn&#8217;t have that many friends in the area at the time, and because of this new working lifestyle was just downright miserable, I found myself heading straight to Blockbuster many a Friday nights after work to get a movie, and waste my night away by myself.  It costs $5 to rent a movie, am I didn&#8217;t even mind cause if I got lazy and didn&#8217;t return the movie within the week, I never had to worry about late fees anymore.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Well times have changed, so have my movie rental preferences, and so has <a href="http://screenrant.com/major-losses-blockbuster-brings-back-late-fees-robf-47292/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScreenRant+%28Screen+Rant+-+TV+and+Movie+News%29">Blockbuster&#8217;s late fee policies</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Much like myself, many users switched to Netflix, the leading movie rental service where you could be as lazy as you like, simply click a few buttons, and the movie of your choice came to your mailbox.  I love this option, said see you later Blockbuster and have never looked back.  Well because so many people have done this, Blockbuster, was forced to bring back their late fees to try to make up for some lost revenue.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Blockbuster already is in deep financial trouble and is closing down stores left and right throughout the country.  The problem with Blockbuster is ironically that in order for the store to thrive, it needs users to rent older movies, which in store Blockbusters lack the selection.  There are many reasons why Netflix is dominating, mainly because there are no brick and mortar building, because the cost of them is way too high, so they rather get a couple of warehouses in the middle of bumblefuck and ship everything out.  Blockbuster hasn&#8217;t realized this yet for reasons I have no idea.  Now they have their own mail in service but are still behind Netflix, especially since they recently made deals with all the gaming systems to <a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/01/netflix-is-making-steaming-videos-available-on-the-wii/">stream movies online</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Blockbuster is in the dumps, and not only Netflix, they have to compete with itunes, on-demand, PPV, and of course illegal downloads.  Bringing back the late fees is a desperate attempt at the company to try to squeeze a little more money out of its customers.  This will backfire.  The ones who are loyal, will be pissed that Blockbuster now is bringing back late fees, and this will most likely cause customers to leave.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em><strong>Either two things are going to happen in the near future with my predictions.</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>1</strong>. Blockbuster is going to file chapter 11, go completely bankrupt and just shut their doors.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>2. </strong> Completely shut down all brick and mortar stores and only be a online movie rental service or some sort of downloadeable service to compete with Netflix and itunes.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Circuit City recently had tons of financial problems, shut down, and rumors are they are going to sprout back up but strictly be an online electronics store.  If Blockbuster ever wants to continue in business, they will have to use this business strategy, otherwise they will be another company we will forget ever existed.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>What do you think about Blockbuster bringing back late fees?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/blockbuster-is-pissing-off-customers-with-bringing-back-late-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP Corey Haim (1971-2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/rip-corey-haim-1971-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/rip-corey-haim-1971-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Haim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We were saddened this morning to hear that 80&#8217;s Teen mega star, Corey Haim, suddenly passed away.  It was originally reported that the death could be drug related, but we are not here to confirm anything.
Haim, to me, is best remembered for his role in the 80&#8217;s teen hit Lucas.  Lucas is one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/6064-corey_haim.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/6064-corey_haim.jpg" alt="" width="278" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>We were saddened this morning to hear that 80&#8217;s Teen mega star, Corey Haim, suddenly passed away.  It was originally reported that the death could be drug related, but we are not here to confirm anything.</p>
<p>Haim, to me, is best remembered for his role in the 80&#8217;s teen hit <em>Lucas</em>.  Lucas is one of the most interesting and captivating characters ever to hit the teen-film world.  Haim is also well remembered for the role of Sam Emerson in <em>The Lost Boys. </em></p>
<p>More recently, Haim was in the papers for his antics with fellow friend Corey Feldman. The two had a reality show together called &#8220;The Two Corey&#8217;s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Haim suffered from drug problems throughout most of his life.  When one moment we think he might be on the road to a clean life, Corey Haim gets unfortunately taken from us.  Haim will forever live as an 80&#8217;s teen all star.</p>
<p><strong>RIP Corey Haim </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/rip-corey-haim-1971-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Iron Man 2 Trailer + Handsome Men&#8217;s Club</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/new-iron-man-2-trailer-handsome-mens-club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/new-iron-man-2-trailer-handsome-mens-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Man 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Kimmel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The new Iron Man 2 trailer debuted on Sunday March 7th, the night of the Oscars. The trailer looks great. We see in this trailer Don Cheadle actually being a second Iron Man along side Tony Stark. The 2 of them take on a robot army built by the bad guys, which appear to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/whattheflick/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/iron-man-2.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/whattheflick/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/iron-man-2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>The new Iron Man 2 trailer debuted on Sunday March 7th, the night of the Oscars. The trailer looks great. We see in this trailer Don Cheadle actually being a second Iron Man along side Tony Stark. The 2 of them take on a robot army built by the bad guys, which appear to be Sam Rockwell in addition to Mickey Rourke.</p>
<p>Check it out here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/new-iron-man-2-trailer-handsome-mens-club/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Also, as a bonus, for those that missed it, Jimmy Kimmel had a hilarious skit Sunday night after the Oscars. The skit is called the &#8220;Handsome Men&#8217;s Club.&#8221; Check out the video below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/new-iron-man-2-trailer-handsome-mens-club/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/new-iron-man-2-trailer-handsome-mens-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Studios Going to go Small Budget From Now On?</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/are-studios-going-to-go-small-budget-from-now-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/are-studios-going-to-go-small-budget-from-now-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kessler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Would a studio rather have an Oscar winning movie or a big blockbuster?  That seems to be a big question out of Hollywood studio execs and although it may seem that studios would want the best quality movie possible, the answer is they don’t care.  Cause like anything else, it’s all about money, and big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/david-and-goliath-sumos2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12818" title="david-and-goliath-sumos2" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/david-and-goliath-sumos2-262x300.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Would a studio rather have an Oscar winning movie or a big blockbuster?  That seems to be a big question out of Hollywood studio execs and although it may seem that studios would want the best quality movie possible, the answer is they don’t care.  Cause like anything else, it’s all about money, and big blockbusters are big money.  <a href="../../../../../2009/06/snap-review-of-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/">Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</a> just won the 2009 Razzie award for Worst Movie of the Year.  Well it also was one of the top money making movies of the year, so as bad as it was, it made a ton of money, and already a 3D third movie is in talks.</p>
<p>But recently a ton of big blockbusters have been very bad.  Sure they have crazy CGI technology and may be entertaining, but they are terrible.  It seems the new trend over the past few years is there is always a few movies each year that goes under the radar, then suddenly blows up around Oscar time and beats out some big time movies.  Crash (2005), <a href="../../../../../2009/12/correction-slumdog-millionaire-is-not-overrated/">Slumdog Millionaire</a> (2009), and now <a href="../../../../../2009/07/snap-review-of-the-hurt-locker/">The Hurt Locker</a> (2010) are three small budget movies that have won the Oscar for Best Picture recently.  Event No Country For Old Men (2008) could even be considered a smaller budget movie as well.</p>
<p>In a time when the economy is in a recession, paying millions for big name actors and big names stunts may not be the best way for a studio to get the biggest ROI out of their product.  It may be better for studios to produce smaller budget films but those of better quality and push those.  It won’t require the big money to make, clearly it doesn’t need the big names to draw fans in, and when the positive press gains, the studio will clearly have a great money making movie, and a quality movie on top of it.  They will increase DVD/online sales, TV rights, and additional positive press for the studios.  I hope studios can learn from these smaller movies like The Hurt Locker and can produce better movies for movie fans in the future.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Would you like to see studios produce more small budget but quality movies?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/are-studios-going-to-go-small-budget-from-now-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observations From Oscar Night</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/observations-from-oscar-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/observations-from-oscar-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kessler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Oscars have come and gone and I can’t believe I spent about 4 hours (including the red carpet preview) watching the Oscars last night.  Wow…do I really need to find something to do on Sunday nights.  I was very happy with the winners announced and was glad to see The Hurt Locker come out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/oscars_1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12812" title="oscars_1" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/oscars_1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The Oscars have come and gone and I can’t believe I spent about 4 hours (including the red carpet preview) watching the Oscars last night.  Wow…do I really need to find something to do on Sunday nights.  I was very happy with the winners announced and was glad to see The Hurt Locker come out on top with 6 awards.</p>
<p><strong>Here are some brief observations of the Oscars.</strong></p>
<p>-How the hell did they come to the decision to have Kathy Ireland do the red carpet interviews?  I feel like the guy in charge must have had a crush on her back in her Necessary Roughness model days and now this gave him the chance to meet her in person.  She is more irrelevant than pogs and was so incredibly fake and that necklace was just not necessary it was laughable.</p>
<p>-The hosts were very good.  You can’t go wrong with pairing Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin.  They worked off of each other very well, kept it simple and the jokes were basic.  Some fell short on me since I’m not an LA person, but like the job they did and too bad as the show went on we saw less and less of them.</p>
<p>-Neil Patrick Harris did a good job with the preopening opening to the Oscars and it seemed like that was an audition to see if he could host the awards next year.  I’m putting my money down now that he will be looked at and possibly get it next year, I was very impressed with him.</p>
<p>-Star Jones had the most awkward red carpet interview with George Clooney.  She basically hit on him and acted like a 13 yr old girl whose locker was filled with Clooney pictures, right in front of his girlfriend/wife person.  If she would have punched her, it would have been youtube gold.</p>
<p>-Was it me or was George Clooney pissed off the entire night?  He’s usually a huge fun goofball and was on the red carpet, but during the show just seemed real pissed off.  Maybe that’s just his face, or maybe he hates the camera on him.  Maybe I missed a joke that was at his expense but it really seemed like every time the camera was on him he was so pissed off.</p>
<p>-Why did they waste time with dancers as they nominated the Best Score category?  I give the dancers credit, they were amazingly talented and it broke my back just looking at them, but what was the point.  The show was running long enough as it was and it was just a pointless waste of time.</p>
<p>-They didn’t show movie clips when presenting Best Cinematography.  Isn’t the whole point of that category to visually show how good the cinematography was?  I consider that a more important category than some others and it got no credit.  Just weird.</p>
<p>-What happened to Farrah Fawcet and Bea Arthur on the memorandum video montage?  Somebody messed up big time on that one.</p>
<p>-Tyler Perry’s little speech as he gave the Best Editing category made no sense.  He kept talking about the camera angles and how different shots could look and different angles would help make the scene look differently, except that doesn’t have to deal with editing, that has to deal with directing.  It just didn’t make any sense and he wasn’t funny like his movies.</p>
<ol></ol>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>These are just a few observations I had, what were some of yours?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/observations-from-oscar-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3/07/10 Box Office Results: Crowds Dive Down Burton’s Rabbit Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/30710-box-office-results-crowds-dive-down-burton%e2%80%99s-rabbit-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/30710-box-office-results-crowds-dive-down-burton%e2%80%99s-rabbit-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ondras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn's Finest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Burton's take on Alice in Wonderland broke records in my box office report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="file:///C:/Users/Nick/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/photo13-1.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-12796 alignright" title="photo13-1" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/photo13-1-1024x561.jpg" alt="" width="493" height="267" /></a></p>
<p>Tim Burton’s trippy live-action take on Lewis Carroll’s classic novels, <a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-alice-in-wonderland-2010/"><em>Alice in Wonderland</em></a>, premiered at #1 with a record-breaking $116.3 million domestic, $210.3 million worldwide gross. In addition to far surpassing director Burton’s previous weekend all-time grosser, 2005’s <em>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory</em>, <em>Wonderland</em> became the biggest opening of all time for a non-sequel movie in the States. Converted to 3D after being filmed in 2D, the movie made 70% of its killings from the red-and-blue glasses. Showing on 3,728 screens, Friday’s intake was a whopping $41 million. Nowhere near the $35 million three-day overall I was predicting. <em>Wonderland</em> is over halfway to making back the $200 million budget Disney gave Burton to make it. However this unsettled many critics (including yours truly) as well. The majority claimed the 2010 imagining boosted style over substance.</p>
<p>In a land outside of your local <em>Alice</em> screenings, Antoine Fuqua’s (<em>Training Day</em>) latest <em>Brooklyn’s Finest</em>, first debuting at the Sundance Film Festival over a year ago, opened to mostly dismissal reviews, earning a 36% on Rotten Tomatoes. The gritty cop drama, following the lives of three New York police officers during a week-long drug affair, started off with $13.5 million. The lowest debut for a Fuqua picture, <em>Brooklyn’s Finest</em> may have only been placed in a bad weekend. I mean between a coked-up cop thriller and a coked-up Disney movie, which would <em>you</em> pick to see?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/02/snap-review-of-shutter-island/"><em>Shutter Island</em></a> dropped two spots and 41.3% to third place, bringing in another $13.3 million. Martin Scorsese’s mind-bender has a total of $95.8 million in three weeks. Kevin Smith’s <em>Cop Out</em>, a movie no one I know has seen yet has still managed to nab a spot in the top five two weekends in a row, grossed $9.1 million, falling 49.8% from last Sunday’s tally. James Cameron’s <a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/2009/12/snap-review-of-avatar/"><em>Avatar</em></a> closes us out with $7.7 million at #5, a domestic haul of $720.2 million in 12 weeks.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Out of the top five-</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Oscar-nominated animated feature <em>The Secret of Kells</em> debuted with $40,000 on one screen.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Here are the box office results according to studio estimates Sunday-</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>1. </strong><strong>Alice in Wonderland (2010)…$116.3 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>2. </strong><strong>Brooklyn’s Finest…$13.5 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>3. </strong><strong>Shutter Island…$13.3 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>4. </strong><strong>Cop Out…$9.1 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>5. </strong><strong>Avatar…$7.7 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>6. </strong><strong>The Crazies (2010)…$7 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>7. </strong><strong>Percy Jackson &amp; The Olympians: The Lightning Thief…$5.1 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>8. </strong><strong>Valentine’s Day…$4.3 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>9. </strong><strong>Crazy Heart…$3.4 million</strong></li>
<li><strong>10. </strong><strong>Dear John…$2.9 million</strong></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/30710-box-office-results-crowds-dive-down-burton%e2%80%99s-rabbit-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Bullock Could Make History</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/sandra-bullock-could-make-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/sandra-bullock-could-make-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Earlier today the 2009 Razzie Award Winners were announced. Sandra Bullock took home the top, or should I say worst, acting prize of the night by winning Worst Actress of the year for &#8220;All About Steve.&#8221;
Never has the same actress won the Razzie and Oscar in the same year. Bullock will be at the Oscars [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www-movieline-com.vimg.net/images/blindsideoscar2.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www-movieline-com.vimg.net/images/blindsideoscar2.jpg" alt="" width="468" height="251" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/09/04/alg_all_about_steve_movie_still.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/09/04/alg_all_about_steve_movie_still.jpg" alt="" width="485" height="332" /></a></p>
<p>Earlier today the 2009 Razzie Award Winners were announced. Sandra Bullock took home the top, or should I say worst, acting prize of the night by winning Worst Actress of the year for &#8220;All About Steve.&#8221;</p>
<p>Never has the same actress won the Razzie and Oscar in the same year. Bullock will be at the Oscars tonight and is the front runner for Best Actress. Her portrayal as Leigh-Ann Toughy in &#8220;The Blind Side&#8221; was one heck of a performance and is likely to get her Oscar gold. I guess all I can say is, Bullock is fairly dynamic if she can put on the best and worst acting performances. Could she make history?</p>
<p>If somebody else has something to say about it, it might be Gabby Sidibe in Precious.</p>
<p>Anyways, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen won for Worst Picture and the Jonas Brothers collectively won Worst Actor for the Jonas Brothers Movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/sandra-bullock-could-make-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snap Review of Alice in Wonderland (2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-alice-in-wonderland-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-alice-in-wonderland-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ondras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mia Wasikowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviebanter.com/?p=12781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My review of Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2010_alice_in_wonderland_007.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-12782" title="ALICE IN WONDERLAND" src="http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2010_alice_in_wonderland_007-1024x570.jpg" alt="" width="615" height="342" /></a>If I could grade a director on effort alone,  Tim Burton would have gotten a much higher rating from me on this. <em>Alice  in Wonderland</em>, the 2010 imagining of Lewis Carroll&#8217;s novels,  is  brimming with so much excess everything at times it&#8217;s uncomfortable to  watch.<br />
Alice is 19-years-old, thirteen years after she first fell  down the rabbit hole as a little kid. Summoned by the original film&#8217;s  gang-bang cast of character, Alice must defeat the evil Red Queen  (Helena Bonham Carter, hilariously imperialistic) from her reign over  the magical kingdom.<br />
Oddly enough, it&#8217;s the little things that make  the movie feel epic. Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter was an expected but  triumphant role for Burton&#8217;s go-to guy, and newcomer Mia Wasikowska in  the title role is top-notch. However way too many characters are  introduced in the movie&#8217;s 90-minute time frame, and are left wandering  around with nothing at all to do. That&#8217;s not the Burton I know; the  adaptation-happy Burton never sacrifices a good story to include all of  the original&#8217;s characters. Look how well he made <em>Sweeney Todd</em> and  <em>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory</em>!<br />
Burton reportedly had a $100  million budget for his take on <em>Wonderland</em>. (Or as this movie stupidly  calls it &#8220;Underland&#8221;, blaming a seven-year-old&#8217;s misunderstanding of the  world&#8217;s original name.) He goes nothing short of crazy with that amount  of money, painting every aspect with gross amounts of color and random  zany paraphernalia. All of it wildly unnecessary.<br />
Leading to a  conclusion that reminded me of something out of <em>Chronicles of Narnia</em>,  Tim Burton&#8217;s <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> is no threat to the original. Yet I  still couldn&#8217;t bring myself to hate it. It&#8217;s not one of Burton&#8217;s better  works, although the great acting and mesmerizing supporting players  we&#8217;ve come to love make it that much easier to digest.</p>
<p><strong>3/5 stars.</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #800080;">Watch my full review of <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQjjxji3jqQ">here</a>!</span><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themoviebanter.com/2010/03/snap-review-of-alice-in-wonderland-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
